logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.07.10 2017고단2275
업무방해
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On May 4, 2016, around 17:00, the Defendant cited a loudspeaker before the office of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul District Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association’s “C District Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association” in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, and “D is whether the head of the association is the head of the Rleras and the manager’s association;

The head of the association, the head of the association, and the management director (E) have been employed by the head of the machine;

Dogs, whether the processed matters are representative;

The sound behind the match "D," etc. openly insulting victims D and E from among the members of the above-mentioned non-emergency measure and the cash clearing group.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to each complaint and withdrawal of accusation received from the court on May 16, 2017, which was after the prosecution of this case, and the statement of agreement, the victims' withdrawal of complaint against the defendant is confirmed. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow