A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant and C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J are members of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Committee for Countermeasures against the Improvement and Improvement of K Housing Redevelopment.

K Housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association was established on June 24, 2010 as a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association established under the Act on the Maintenance of Urban and Residential Environments for the Seongbuk-gu Seoul and 782 lot project implementation zone, and was authorized to implement the project on May 7, 2015, and on June 25, 2015, the procedures for application for apartment purchase were implemented through a general meeting of members.

Defendant

On the contrary of the above redevelopment, etc., the K Emergency Measures Committee was organized to promote the dissolution of the redevelopment and improvement project association of the above housing, and the members were placed in front of the M in the same area, and were engaged in activities such as the requisition for dissolution consent and the rejection of the application for parcelling-out of the above apartment, and

The defendant, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J in collusion with us how us we believe that the partnership will resign at the office of the Seongbuk-gu Seoul N, the second floor K Housing Redevelopment Project Association from September 18, 2015 to September 18, 2015, together with the resignation of the partnership head, the secretary general, the administrator of the board of directors, the management director resignation, the resignation of the executive director, and the dismissal of the partnership.

The head and officers of the partnership shall immediately resign, and the head and directors of the partnership shall not be the head and directors of the partnership, the head and directors of the partnership shall not be the head and the head of the partnership shall not be the head and shall be in charge of the duties in trust and in trust of Domine fla;

The summary of the evidence is that the head of the cooperative, the head of the cooperative, and the head of the cooperative, by force, interfered with the sale of apartment units, such as O, the head of the office, and Q, working in the above partnership office by force, such as drinking stuff, etc.

1. Each statement made by the witnessO, Q, R and P in the third trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of each police station against theO and a statement made by each police station;

1. Each statement of Q, R and P;

1. Recording notes and written opinions of the press;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;