logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.18 2015가단5242613
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor

(a) Indication of claims: Attached cause of claims, modified cause of claims, and reasons for participation; and

(However, “creditor” shall be deemed to be “Plaintiff,” “debtor,” “Defendant,” respectively. (b)

Defendant A: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

(c) Defendant B and Defendant C: Judgment by deeming confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. The plaintiff's claim is without merit, since the plaintiff transferred the above claim to the plaintiff's successor intervenor during the lawsuit of this case to the plaintiff's successor.

(Plaintiff submitted a written withdrawal from a lawsuit on January 14, 2016, but the withdrawal has no effect without the consent of the Defendants).

arrow