1. The Defendant shall pay to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff KRW 53,847,477 and KRW 50,00,000 among them, from May 16, 2015.

1. The judgment on the claim of the plaintiff succeeding intervenor [the indication of the claim] attached to the claim and the reasons for participation are as shown.

[Reasons for Recognition] Service by Publication (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. The plaintiff's successor's application for intervention in succession was defective on the ground that the plaintiff's successor to the plaintiff's claim received the claim during the lawsuit of this case while the lawsuit of this case was pending, and the plaintiff recognized the transfer of claim. Thus

(A) The plaintiff submitted a written withdrawal from a lawsuit, but it was submitted after the closing of argument, and the withdrawal is not effective because the defendant's consent thereto is not obtained).