1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Details of the instant disposition

(a) On September 11, 2014, 718-13 of the same Ri 718-16 of the same Ri 718-35 of the same Ri 718-37 of the same 718-36 of the same 718-37 of the same 718-37 of the same 718-37 of the same 718-39 of the same 98-4 of the same 200-ri 29 of the same 98-ri 2,000 1,000 square meters of facilities and capacity (kW) for the Plaintiff’s status and 1,000 718-18 of the same 9-ri 205 of the same 9-ri 205 of the same 1,000 718-ri 29,000 718-ri 718-ri 3718-ri 718-ri 3718-ri

(hereinafter referred to as "land of this case", each of which is referred to as "the land of this case", and when referring to "the site of this case".

(1) As to the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case on October 27, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for permission for development activities with the Defendant on November 4, 2014 for permission for development activities, and filed an application with the Defendant for permission for construction of each solar power plant and for alteration of form and quality of development activities for the instant project (hereinafter collectively referred to as “application of this case”).

1. There is a concern over undermining the surrounding scenery and aesthetic view;

(a) The site for the application is the site for the disposal and maintenance of the waste salt in a separate area of east,00,000 adjacent to the wetlands protection area, and most of the surrounding areas of the application site are excellent landscape resources that can view diverse animals and plants, coastal landscape, and tidelands, focusing only on net thousands.