1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff applying for the Plaintiff’s development permit is a company established for solar energy business, etc. with the aim of ① the facility capacity of 3,00 kilograms on the ground of 43,574 square meters in the aggregate of 19,200 m3,000 m3,000 m3,000 m3,000 m3,000 m3,000 m3,000 m3,000 m3,000 m29,647 m29,647 m29,647 m29,000 m29,000 m2,00 m2,00 m2,00 m2,00 m2,00 m2,00 m2,00 m3,000 m2,00 m2,000 m2,00 m2,00 m2,01.

In order to create a site for the instant project, the Plaintiff filed an application for permission for development activities on the land Nos. 1 and 2 on October 27, 2014 with the Defendant for each of the instant land Nos. 3 and 4 on November 4, 2014 (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant application”).

The defendant's non-permission disposition was rendered against the plaintiff on January 28, 2015 on the land of this case Nos. 1 and 2, and on February 3, 2014, the defendant rejected each development act on the land of this case Nos. 3 and 4 on February 3, 2014

(hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant Disposition”). 1. There is a concern over impeding the surrounding landscape and aesthetic view

A. The filing site is a site adjacent to the wetlands protection area of a net,00,000 square meters, and most of which are the site for the disposal and maintenance of the waste salt in a separate East East East Eastern, and is an area surrounding the site for the distribution of outstanding landscape resources that can view various animals and plants, coastal landscape, and sandbars mainly, centering on the net, and where artificial facilities are integrated by adjoining the coastline near the net, the continuity of natural landscape.