logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.05.18 2016고합688
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Gohap 688"

1. On September 14, 2016, the Defendant was subject to investigation by arresting a police officer who was dispatched to the site upon receiving a report from the victim and obstructing his/her duties by threatening him/her as if he/she had the victim E (50 years old and South) who was the owner of a business under the influence of alcohol in Suwon-si C, and "D convenience store", and by threatening him/her as he/she threatened with drinking, as he/she threatens him/herself, and thereby obstructing his/her duties by threatening him/her, he/she was arrested as a current criminal and investigated.

After being investigated and released on September 15, 2016, the Defendant, at around 11:00, found the “D convenience store” again in the “D convenience store” to the victim.

C. The feasia was infinite, but the finite.

C. Purpose of the Declaration;

C. Hashee another gushea and Rashea, Kashea, Gashea 10 days Gashea Gashea.

The inside and outside of the Republic of Korea also finds it every day after the aftermathy of the Republic of Korea.

The victim threatened the victim, such as “a threat,” etc., thereby threateninging the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim with the purpose of retaliation against the victim's statement of damage to investigation agencies in connection with the investigation of his criminal case.

2. On June 2016, the Defendant: (a) was drunkly found at the “D convenience store” as stated in paragraph (1) around KRW 23:30; and (b) was discharged from can cans in a cooling house; and (c) the Defendant was able to do so.

The victim F (L, 49 years of age) who is an employee of F (L, e.g., an employee) said F (L, e.g., the value of an article was calculated and returned to E, without calculating the value of the article, is the victim’s “I am fych fych fych fych fych fych fych fych fychhh

At the last time, the obsing theory "," and the victim's sexual remarks, etc. interfered with the victim's convenience store operation by force.

3. Magion;

A. On August 2016, the Defendant found around 15:00 and around 15:0, the Defendant was an employee who was drunkly found in the convenience store specified in paragraph 1, and was in a cooling house, two cans and two cans and bals in the cans.

arrow