A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who engages in transportation business with the trade name "Sacheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Co., Ltd. Co. 212 B.

1. On October 21, 2015, around 05:16, the Defendant: (a) entered the convenience store “E” under the above C C 108 “E”; (b) ordered 1 A of the 6mg tobacco to be put on the victim F, an employee; and (c) attempted to steal the Defendant by using the flag personal cans and coffee, which were in front of the above convenience store, without calculating the 1 A of the flag tobacco, and the flag personal cans and coffee, which were in front of the above convenience store.

2. The Defendant interfering with his business refers to the victim who returned to the Kabter at the same place as above 1’s temporary location to the effect that “the victim does not come to the mind of the 6mg of the Kab to the Kabter” is demanded to make another tobacco, and the victim’s hand to the effect that “I w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w

The victim interfered with the victim's business for about 10 minutes, such as continuing to take a bath, continuing the victim to avoid disturbance, such as taking the victim's finger, and preventing other customers who visited the convenience store from purchasing goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation report (verification of CCTV at a place of occurrence), investigation report (to hear statements from the victim's counter phone) (the defendant is aware that he was aware that driving was calculated under the influence of alcohol, and there was no intention to larceny;

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence are as follows: ① As a result of CCTV verification, the defendant entered the convenience store in this case; ② the defendant taken cans and coffee in the cooling house.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant had intention to larceny at the time, and (b) the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, inasmuch as the Defendant had intention to larceny at the time, taking account of the fact that the latter part of the convenience store was going through a door, and (c) the Defendant’

Application of Statutes

1. Criminal facts;