Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of five million won.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the owner of the commercial sex trafficking business in Kimpo-si D, and the defendant A is the head of the management office of the above business.

1. Defendant B, from around December 15, 2014 to September 30, 2015, had approximately 60 square meters from the above “E” and had employees engaged in sexual traffic find the above business place and had them sexually engage in sexual intercourse with the unspecified number of male customers, and received KRW 5 to 110,000 per capita from the above male customers and arranged sexual traffic.

2. Defendants B and A conspired, and, from October 1, 2015 to October 3, 2015, had female employees including F (e.g., trade name) engage in sexual intercourse with other unspecified male customers, such as G and H, in which they found the said business place, and arranged sexual intercourse by receiving 5-110,000 won per man from the said male customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to entries in the seizure record;

1. The Defendants of the relevant criminal facts: Comprehensively, Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning crimes from October 1, 2015 to October 3, 2015)

1. Defendant A who is selected to impose a fine: Imprisonment with prison labor and a fine concurrently (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic);

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant B of a suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants, with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, have led to the confession of the instant crime and his mistake, appears to have discontinued the instant business, and were punished for the same kind of crime against Defendant B.