beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 15,857,14, Plaintiff C, and Plaintiff D respectively, and each of them on November 3, 2014.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The parties' status and the deceased A's death 1) The defendant was established as the Japanese chemical and industrial company on October 17, 1969 and was converted into the Japanese chemical and industrial company on February 23, 197 and then changed into the current trade name on December 29, 199, and a factory producing asbestos products on the ground of 525th of the Busan Eastdong-gu, Busan (hereinafter "the asbestos factory of this case") around October 1969 (hereinafter "the asbestos factory of this case").
(2) From March 2, 1972 to September 30, 1975, the asbestos plant of this case was newly built to manufacture asbestos products, such as asbestos yarn, asbestos capture, asbestos tape, and asbestos log, and closed the asbestos plant of this case on March 26, 1990. After that, the asbestos plant of this case was shut down until the end of 2006. (2) The deceased A (hereinafter referred to as the “the deceased”) was an employee who was working for the asbestos plant of this case operated by the defendant, and was exposed to the blue asbestos of this case on March 2, 1972 to September 30, 1975 in the process, and was diagnosed with a lue asbestos of lusium at Busan National University Hospital.
After that, on May 16, 2016, the Deceased died of pulmonary typology due to bad neute while receiving treatment of the above diagnostic certificate.
3) The deceased’s successors are Plaintiff C and Plaintiff D, the spouse of the deceased, and Plaintiff C and the deceased. (B) Until now, the asbestos storage plant located in Korea has almost 14 small and medium-sized businesses with less than 30 workers, and most of the asbestos storage plant located in Busan was located in 9, 2 small and medium-sized businesses in Busan, 2 small and medium-sized businesses in the middle, Ulsan, and one business establishment in the middle, and one business establishment in the north, the number of workers and production of which were the largest, are the asbestos plant in this case operated by the defendant.
2 The defendant produced asbestos products from December 1969 to March 26, 1990 in the asbestos plant of this case, and between them.