beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 36,850,213 to Plaintiff A; KRW 6,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and KRW 2,00,000,00 to Plaintiff C and Plaintiff D, respectively.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The relation 1) The defendant is a company established as the Japanese chemical and industrial company on October 17, 1969 and converted into the Japanese chemical and industrial company on February 23, 197 and then changed to the current trade name on December 29, 199, and a factory producing asbestos products on the ground 525th ground around October 1969 (hereinafter referred to as the "asbestos factory of this case").
From December 1969, the company newly built the asbestos plant in this case and closed the asbestos plant in this case on March 26, 1990. After that, the company had been working for the asbestos plant in this case operated by the defendant, the company manufacturing asbestos diskettes, street cards, etc. had been exposed for a long time to blue asbestos, white asbestos in this process, and was diagnosed as the "serious scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc
3) Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and Plaintiff D are children of Plaintiff A. B. The working environment of the asbestos plant of this case, etc. 1) had been located in Korea so far, most of 14 asbestos storage factories located in Korea are small and medium-sized businesses with less than 30 workers, and one place of business is known to have been distributed in 9, 2, 2, Ulsan, and 1, to the Chungcheongbuk. Among them, the asbestos storage factories of this case operated by the Defendant are the asbestos storage factories of this case.
2) The defendant produced asbestos products from December 1969 to March 26, 1990 in the asbestos plant of this case. Among them, it is confirmed that at least 1,515 workers who worked in the asbestos plant of this case were at least 1,515 workers. 3) The defendant has not affixed a string to workers before around 1976.