logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (전주) 2018.10.25 2017나12788
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance are as follows, except for the following conclusion or addition as to the assertion that the Plaintiff emphasizes or adds to this court, and thus, the reasoning for this court’s acceptance of the judgment of the first instance is identical to the reasons for the first instance judgment.

(원고의 항소이유는 제1심에서의 주장과 크게 다르지 않고, 제1심에 제출된 증거에다가 이 법원에 제출된 증거를 보태어 보더라도 제1심의 사실인정과 판단은 정당하다). 2. 고쳐 쓰는 부분 ◎ 제1심 판결 2쪽 12행 중 “② 전북 완주군 C”는 『② 전북 완주군 G』로 고친다.

◎ 이 법원에서의 청구 감축에 따라 제1심 판결 3쪽 21행의 “그러나” 이후부터 4쪽 3행까지를 다음과 같이 고친다.

The Defendants’ liability ratio is 50% in light of the negligence ratio on the Plaintiff’s side, such as the shortage, recovery, etc., to seek only the amount of damage caused by the closure of the seeds and seedlings. Accordingly, the Defendants jointly share the Plaintiff with the Act on Liability for Environmental Damage and Relief (hereinafter “Environmental Damage Relief Act”).

(i) 42,00,000 won (=84,000,000 x 50%) and damages for delay shall be paid either in accordance with or by analogy to it.

3. Additional determination

A. As to the closure death of the instant case No. 1, the Plaintiff reduced the Plaintiff’s claim to seek only a part of the damage caused by the intermediate seeds and seedlings death in this court.

Therefore, we examine the plaintiff's argument on intermediate seeds among these additional arguments.

The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the intermediate seeds and seedlings were discontinued in the Chapter 1 of this case where the first waste company occurred.

However, in the first instance court, the Plaintiff does not specify the type and number of the instant fish breeding and waste-speaking fish. The result of the first instance court’s entrustment of appraisal by stating the purport of the claim and the grounds for the claim as of March 28, 2016.

arrow