All appeals by the defendant are dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Order of the first instance court No. 1-b.

(b) in paragraph (3).

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding or dismissing the following:

(The grounds for appeal by the Defendant are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of the first instance, the findings of fact in the first instance court and the judgment are justifiable). The third-class 2 through 8 of the first instance court are as follows.

“A. 1) The Plaintiffs shared 1/5 shares in the attached list Nos. 1 or 12, respectively, and Plaintiff D owned the real estate No. 13 of the attached list solely.

On the other hand, real estate No. 14 is the land registered by the Republic of Korea as its owner.

(2) Each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet was divided into “the instant real estate” and “1,785 square meters prior to the date of the instant sales contract,” and “30 square meters prior to the date of the instant sales contract,” and “30 square meters prior to the date of the instant sales contract, since the entire land prior to the division is recognized as being the object of sale and purchase according to the entry of the instant sales contract, the divided land was divided into “3-1 real estate of this case” and “3-2 real estate of this case,” and “3 real estate of this case” as “3-2 real estate of this case,” and “the divided land of this case,” which is divided into “the instant real estate of this case,” and “the instant real estate of this case,” which is referred to as “the instant real estate of this case.”

Meanwhile, the real estate No. 14 of this case is written in the title section of the entire certificate of registered matters as “AC large 53 square meters (174.9 square meters)”, but in addition to the whole purport of the pleadings in the written evidence No. 9, 13, and No. 2, No. 4, and No. 21 of this case as to the real estate No. 14 of this case, the land category and the area in the title section of this case as to the real estate No. 14 of this case are deemed to be a clerical error of “the ditch 1,85