1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. As to the claim for the payment by subrogation

A. The reasoning for the court’s argument in this part is as follows. One of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance has accepted the judgment as follows.

Since it is the same as the statement in the claim, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[The part used for repair] Part 2, from Part 4, to Part 5, "four sites" in Part 2, from Part 4, are "the four construction sites" in Part 4, "the four construction sites of the previous North Korea-gun C construction works, the previous North Korea-gun D construction works, the previous North Korea-gun Q forest road improvement works, and the previous North Korea-gun forest road facility construction works (hereinafter referred to as "each construction site of this case")," respectively.

Part 2 up to 34,430,00 won “2,50,000 won” from Part 15 up to part 18 of Part 15 up to “34,430,00 won [10,500,000 won for a person operating a Hen oil station at fuel expenses, each of them is 5,060,000 won for use of each dump truck, L, 2,810,000 won for a dump truck, each of them is 2,80,000,000 won for a dump truck, and 3,150,000,000 won for a n, and 2,50,000,000 won for a n's rent, 5,910,000 for a n's fee, 2,500,000 won for purchase, 2,500 or less for a hump truck, 1381.

In full view of each of the testimony and arguments of the witness of the first instance trial, the witness of the L, J, I, R, N, and the witness of the first instance trial, the Plaintiff was working as the head of each of the construction sites of this case performed by the Defendant and introduced figures and material business operators to the Defendant through O, etc., who is a person in charge of the Defendant in each of the construction sites of this case, who is the Defendant at each of the construction sites of this case, and the Defendant was either supplied oil at each of the construction sites of this case or dump trucks, dump trucks, and dump trucks. In full view of the purport of the testimony and arguments of the witness of the first instance trial, the above I, J, L, L, R, and N were paid money from the Defendant as a witness at each of the construction sites of this case.