Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, with respect to Defendant A, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a defect in a story that the victim E, who was a friendly meeting, withdraws from or expelled from the meeting, completed a meeting of friendship and finds a friendly victim who returned home, and subsequently finds it difficult to do so.

At the same time, he was towed into G cafeteria in Busan Sho-gu F.

Defendant

A means, on April 12, 2017, at around 20:20, the victim “hing away from the valley due to the collapse” in the above restaurant, and the victim’s “Isson Malaysia”;

All of the answers to "the decision of the members" were made by the members, and the victim was satisfed behind the victim, and the defendant B was also combined with the defendant B, batfing the victim's satch, satching out of the restaurant, and satching it.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted on the victim about 12 weeks of treatment on the left-hand pelle electronic pelle, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Some of the statements made by the prosecution against the Defendants in the suspect interrogation protocol

1. Partial statements made to H in the police statement protocol;

1. Application of the laws and regulations, such as a medical certificate and investigation report (as to the attachment of booms CD images);

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of a sentence of imprisonment for a crime under the relevant Article of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc.;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A) of the suspended execution;

1. Defendant B, on the grounds of conviction against Defendant A and the victim under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order (Defendant A) claimed that Defendant B was carrying the victim’s clothes in order to fight against Defendant A and the victim, but Defendant B was only getting off the victim’s clothes after the victim, and that he did not have flabed or pushed down the victim’s flab.

However, the victim committed assault with the Defendant A, such as Defendant B’s flabation, etc. from the site of the accident to this court.

Defendant A makes a statement to the same effect in this Court.