1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one million won;

2. Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 8, 2013, at around 17:30, the Defendant performed E and alcohol in a D restaurant located in Cheongju-si, a considerable area of Cheongju-si, and was under the influence of the victim F (56 years of age) to enter a restaurant, and bread it was pushed down the victim’s breath, pushed over the floor by cutting down the victim’s candle, and breadd the back when drinking back the breath.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, and E in part;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the primary charge) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse;

1. On October 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around October 17:30, 2013, at the D restaurant located in Cheongju-si, the victim F (56 years of age) was drunk to enter the restaurant; (b) took a breath of the victim’s breath while drinking the breath; (c) breath of the breath; (d) breath of the breath; and (d) breath of the breath; and (d) breath of the breath’s body, the breath of the breath of the bridge

As a result, the defendant added a cage cage cage cages that require approximately six weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

2. According to the written diagnosis of injury, it can be recognized that F was suffering from a cage of cages cages, which requires a fagecage treatment on October 8, 2013 at around six weeks.

Defendant

In addition, the defense counsel asserts to the effect that the defendant had only one time of the F's chests, but did not have any cages at cages, and that the defendant's assault and cages at f's cages do not have any relation to sages.

The F, in investigative agencies and this court, when the Defendant was pushed down with flab and flabed with flab, did not go beyond flab, and when flabed, the part facing the floor was faced with the opposite flab, and the opposite flab, and when flabed with the bones, the flabed flab was caused by flab on two occasions after flabing.