logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.08.28 2017고단2846
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, for eight months, and for two months, for each of the defendants C.

However, the defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Busan District Court on April 6, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month. Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment and six years for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Busan District Court on February 9, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 10th of the same month. Defendant B was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment for robbery, etc. at the Busan High Court on July 25, 201 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Gpool prison on August 31, 201.

[Criminal facts]

1. No person who commits a joint crime with Defendant B, etc. shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging money exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results, such as scores obtained through the use of game water;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, together with J and K, operated the game room in the name of “M” on the first floor of the building located in Busan-gu L, Busan-gu, and K served as the “the president of the branch” who is able to act as a business owner at an investigative agency, etc. in preparation for the crackdown on the above game site, and the Defendant conspired to operate the game room in order to operate the game room by performing the role of exchanging coophones acquired from the game in the above game site.

According to the above public offering, the Defendant, along with J and K from June 2014 to August 29, 2014, set up 60 game instruments with the above game room and set up 10,000 game software in the camping-related game, and had many unspecified customers find the game, and issued a coophone for which 20,000 won per one point of the game score to the customers who completed the game, and exchanged the remainder after deducting 10% of the face value of the coophone as commission.

Accordingly, in collusion with J et al., the defendant runs a business to transfer scores obtained through the use of the above game water, which is an intangible result.

arrow