1. The defendant

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From October 2, 2014, the above-mentioned A

subsection (b).

1. Determination

A. In full view of the purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and Eul evidence No. 1, the plaintiff is obligated to pay five million won deposit (one million won shall be replaced by the contract payment, two million won shall be replaced by the flood control construction cost paid by the defendant, and the remaining balance shall be 2.5 million won shall be 2.5 million won), monthly rent, 200,000 won from October 17, 201 to October 17, 201, and 170,000 won shall be delivered to the plaintiff on the ground that the defendant's lease contract of this case was lawfully delivered from the defendant to the defendant on October 17, 201, and 2.5 million won shall be delivered to the plaintiff on the ground that the defendant's termination of the lease contract of this case shall be 1.7 million won from the date of the monthly rent to October 27, 201, and 2.1 million won shall be delivered to the plaintiff on the ground that the contract of this case was terminated.

B. As to the 1st of this, the Defendant alleged that the Defendant’s monthly rent claim claimed by the Plaintiff has expired, and thus, the Defendant did not delay the monthly rent from July 2, 201 to July, 201, and the fact that the monthly rent was 200,000 won per month in the instant lease agreement was earlier.