1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Appendix 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 6 as a whole, the Plaintiff, on February 1, 2014, agreed that the Plaintiff may terminate the lease agreement if the Defendant was in arrears on at least two occasions while leasing real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Defendant as security deposit 5,00,000, monthly rent 15,000, and lease period from March 1, 2013 to 24 months, and the Defendant’s refusal to pay the monthly rent from June 1, 2014. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s agent paid the Defendant the overdue rent, etc. by November 30, 2014, and expressed his/her intention to terminate the said lease agreement by transferring the said real estate to the Defendant.

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the above lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was terminated on November 30, 2014 upon the Plaintiff’s declaration of termination on the grounds of delinquency in payment of monthly rent at least twice by the Defendant. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the above real estate to the Plaintiff, and to pay damages for delay calculated at the annual rate of 15% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from June 1, 2014 to October 31, 2015, as the Plaintiff seeks, from June 1, 2014 to October 31, 2015 (=15,000 x 17) and its last monthly rent from November 1, 2015 to November 4, 2015.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.