1. The Defendants jointly do so to the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the Appointeds:

(a) the real estate listed in Appendix 1 List 1.

1. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 3 through 8 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the designated parties entered into a special agreement with the Defendants on June 2, 2012 that “The lease deposit: 20 million won, monthly rent: 1.8 million won, and the lease period: by May 14, 2014 (2).” The Defendants entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff and the designated parties, stating that “The Defendants shall implement the procedure for change of the name regarding the right to business license as stated in the attached Table No. 1 List No. 1 List No. 2, and bear the Defendants,” but the Defendants did not pay monthly rent, the Plaintiff and the designated parties revoked the instant lease contract due to the Defendants’ delinquency, and the Defendants filed a duplicate of the complaint with the Defendants up to 1010.16.16.

According to the above facts, the above lease agreement between the plaintiff, the designated parties, and the defendants was lawfully terminated by the notice of termination on the part of the plaintiff and the designated parties on the grounds of the defendants' delinquency in the monthly rent. Thus, the defendants are obligated to deliver the plaintiff and the designated parties the amount of 350.15 square meters of underground floor entertainment bars among the real estate listed in attached Table 1 (1).

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.