1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

2. The defendant.

1. The plaintiff sought the payment of loans and wages to the defendant, and the court of first instance dismissed all the plaintiff's claims.

On the other hand, the plaintiff appealed to both the loan and the claim for wage. However, it is clear that the part of the claim for wage was withdrawn and the part of the claim for loan was expanded, so only the part of the claim for loan is subject to the judgment of the court.

2. Judgment on the ground of the Plaintiff’s claim

A. 1) The Plaintiff, as a Chinese national of the Joseon Dynasty, resided in the Defendant’s house from around September 12, 2005, and opened the Defendant’s mother E, and took care of Nonparty F, the Defendant’s child. The Plaintiff was unable to engage in financial transactions under his own name as an illegal sojourn, and was making a financial transaction, such as receiving monthly wages by using the account in the name of Nonparty D, the birthee, and as indicated below, remitted money from the account in the name of Nonparty C, the Plaintiff’s spouse, to the account in the Defendant’s name.

순번 대여일자 금액(단위 원) 입금자 지급방식 1 2010. 2. 12. 1,000,000 D 계좌이체 2 2010. 2. 19. 6,000,000 D 3 2010. 2. 19. 4,000,000 D 4 2010. 4. 2. 50,000,000 D 무통장입금 5 2010. 6. 4. 20,000,000 D 6 2010. 7. 13. 500,000 D 계좌이체 7 2010. 8. 30. 600,000 D 8 2010. 10. 1 2,000,000 D 9 2010. 10. 15. 2,000,000 D 10 2010. 11. 1. 2,000,000 D 11 2010. 12. 1. 6,000,000 D 12 2010. 12. 1. 6,000,000 D 13 2010. 12. 1. 6,000,000 D 14 2010. 12. 1. 2,000,000 D 15 2011. 2. 28. 2,000,000 D 16 2011. 3. 14. 3,000,000 D 17 2011. 4. 25 5,000,000 D 18 2011. 5. 16. 5,000,000 D 19 2011. 6. 24. 4,600,000 D 20 2011. 7. 18. 2,000,000 D 21 2011. 7. 26. 3,000,000 C 합계 132,700,000 3 원고는 피고와 2010. 4. 2.자 대여금 50,000,000원에 대하여 이자 월 700,000원, 2010. 6. 4.자 대여금 20,000,000원에 대하여 이자 월 400,000원을 각 지급받기로 약정하였고, 피고로부터 2010. 4. 10....