The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, although the defendant merely made a verbal dispute with the victim and did not have a clear relation with the victim, is erroneous in misconception of facts.

B. The sentence (two million won of fine) imposed by the lower court on the grounds of unreasonable sentencing is excessively unreasonable.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, we find it reasonable to find the court below guilty of the facts charged in this case.

According to CCTV images taken by some of the scene of this case at the time, if the defendant walked to the elevator through the entrance stairs, and then came to the elevator with the victim D, before the elevator, the defendant was in a dispute with the victim, and the victim was over, and the surface of the elevator occurred again thereafter.

The defendant continued to keep the victim away from his/her elevator by preventing him/her from getting off. However, it was true that the defendant and the victim before the elevator used a tangible force that spawns the victim in the process of getting the victim into the elevator before the elevator, and the latter was not proper since the elevator door was closed. Thus, even if the defendant's own assertion is based on his/her own opinion, it can be inferred that the victim was in excess of his/her own act.

B. Examining the photograph of the victim immediately after the instant case, the part of the victim’s head save is added, and the victim was diagnosed with two parts requiring two weeks’ treatment.

The injured party, while making a dispute before an elevator with the defendant, he was faced with the back head by pushing the chest part of his chest.