logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.08.07 2017고단2315
상해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.

on the part of the defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On September 7, 2017, the Suwon District Court sentenced imprisonment with prison labor for 10 months for the crime of bodily injury in Suwon District Court, which became final and conclusive on May 4, 2018.

1. The Defendants were willing to jointly operate the game site without a mutual permission in the vicinity of the greenhouse greenhouse near the Ansan-si, and Defendant A was willing to share the role of exercising overall control over the operation of the game site, Defendant B, a game place, to recruit customers, and to share the role of providing funds, such as the cost of purchasing the game machine.

Therefore, from February 11, 2017 to April 8, 2017, the Defendants established 30 game machine in the open-to-air game without being classified as the class at the head of the said sea-to-sea game site, which was a vinyl, and charged points by converting the amount of money from customers into 5,000 won per one point, and had customers gain points in the game which appeared by chance on the computer screen by turning the amount of money corresponding to the picture appearing by chance, and had customers obtain points in the same amount of money. In the event they want to exchange, they exchange in cash the amount of money calculated by deducting 10% of the commission for exchange by converting the remaining points into 5,00 won per one point.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to provide game water that was not classified by the above method, exchanged the results obtained through the use of the game water, and conducted speculative acts that cause property benefits or losses to the users by using the speculative gaming machines.

2. On July 4, 2017, at around 01:40, the Defendant requested the Victim F (F) who was aware of the fact that he had been a sponsor’s sponsor in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, to make a towing and a telephone call within three times a sponsor, but the Defendant refused this request. However, the Defendant offered the Victim F (F) who was aware of the fact that he was a sponsor of the sponsor within the sponsor of Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun.

arrow