Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 27, 2015, on June 27, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victim by posting a document on the C apartment elevator and the entrance bulletin board of the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, stating that “The victim D, who is the current representative, majored in the young and law, was too old and presumed to be the author, and is so big that he may feel human life.” In addition, the author posted a document on the statement stating that “The victim D, who is the current representative, was at the age of the young and the law, was presumed to be the author, who was aware that he would have caused the same behavior in the criminal case related to the author.”

2. Around June 28, 2015, around July 6, 2015, around July 8, 2015, and around July 8, 2015, the insult Defendant: (a) around June 28, 2015; and (b) the same year;

7. In the letter of consent of the above C apartment around June and around the 8th of the same month, “The victim D who is the present representative of the C apartment will, on his own initiative, disregard and treat the procedure.”

I also know of the detailed contents, but I have the possibility to see that we will be congested, but we will be able to see.

Excellently, the president resists the illegality of the construction, and the president resists against the enemy by setting up his book, and exercises a pair of bath and violence to the parent generation, and his rounding is the third.

“Publicly insulting the victim by inserting a document written with the content “”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on urgency and resident status with a thickness of residents;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Since the gist of the argument was properly pointed out by the defendant, it does not constitute insult, and even if so, it is legitimate in light of social norms.