The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (legal scenarios) was elected by the Defendant with the consent of the majority of 105 occupants around June 21, 2015.

Nevertheless, the victim still posted a document stating that he/she should still claim his/her status as the representative and pay the management fee in his/her name.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the above documents as stated in the facts charged, based on the legitimate authority as the representative, and the illegality is excluded as a legitimate act.

2. Determination

A. The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below reveals that ① from 2011 to 105 apartment units were vacant units, ② from 105 apartment units E, the chairperson of the Residential Self-Governing Council, a self-governing organization consisting of each Dong representative, collected management expenses from 105 unit occupants, on behalf of 105 unit units from 105 unit units, ② the defendant, the occupant of 105 unit 304 unit, demanded E to newly select 105 unit units, and E demanded the defendant to sign the apartment management office around June 21, 2015 with the promise of "10 unit occupants to elect the Dong unit 105 unit unit," and the defendant did not have the consent of 105 unit 16 unit 1, unit 105 unit 2, unit 16 unit 2, unit 105 unit , unit 20, unit 204 unit , unit 20, unit 204 unit , unit 20, unit 205 unit dong unit 3.