logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.01.29 2014고단5977
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicle) is a driver of a passenger car BM520

On September 8, 2014, the Defendant operated a four-lane road ahead of the Gyeongsan Fire Fighting Station located in Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si on September 23:37, 2014 from the direction of pressure from the front side of Yong-nam University.

The location is a place where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, and there is a crosswalk, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely operate the crosswalk after checking whether there is a pedestrian prior to the entry of the crosswalk according to the new code.

Nevertheless, in violation of the new subparagraph, the defendant was driven by the defendant on the left side of the victim C (Woo, 19 years old) crossing the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals by running the red signals in the direction of the defendant's proceeding.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant suffered injury to the left-hand slotr, the lower court did not take necessary measures, such as relief, etc., even though it did not take necessary measures, such as rescue, etc., for the victim due to such occupational negligence.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any automobile on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

3. Any person who has taken over a motor vehicle registered in violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act shall file an application for the registration of movement with the competent authority, such as a Mayor/

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not make an application for the registration of transfer without justifiable grounds despite having received the BMF 520 car from a person who was under the name of the Defendant on April 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The credit bureau and the mandatory insurance bureau;

1. A medical certificate (C);

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A reporter who is involved in the investigation report and pedestrian signal;

arrow