logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.06.26 2014고단1506
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 06:30 on November 23, 2013, the Defendant, while driving a B AB car and driving a four-lane in front of the welfare center of the Yong-Namnam University located in the Dong-dong in Gyeonggi-do at the time of Gyeonggi-do, from the off-distance to the voltage level, was negligent in violating the signal to the vehicle stop signal, and caused the victim C (Nam, 65 years old) to walk on the pedestrian crossing, which caused the victim to go through the pedestrian stop signal. The Defendant suffered from the front part of the Defendant's car and caused the victim to suffer a serious fulgization, which requires about 16 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (victim's statement and person in charge's statement);

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order caused the instant traffic accident by the Defendant’s negligence and causing injury to the victim. However, the Defendant was the first offender and the victim agreed smoothly with the victim. The Defendant was covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. are considered as having taken into account the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence

arrow