1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 1, 1987, the Plaintiff was employed as the subordinate agricultural cooperative located in the Cheongdong-si (hereinafter “agricultural cooperative”) and was in office as a member of the Audit Planning Division and the Loan Review Committee on April 6, 201, following the Plaintiff’s transfer of the Plaintiff to the Defendant on April 6, 201.

B. On August 23, 2012, the 17th Loan Review Committee (hereinafter “former Loan Review Committee”) Defendant on August 23, 2012 (hereinafter “former Loan Review Committee”).

(2) The Plaintiff attended the previous Loan Review Committee and opposed to the loan on the ground that “The primary debtor C, D(C’s type), and D’s loan amount to KRW 800,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won out of the loan is suspected to be used for the repayment of the existing debt of D, the primary debtor C, who provided security, and the primary debtor C has no particular occupation, and the real estate offered as security is less realized into a sports site.”

3) However, the above agenda was approved with the consent of a majority of the members. However, the loan manager decided not to execute the loan after taking into account the possibility of the repayment of the loan by taking into account the Plaintiff’s dissenting opinions. (C) On August 30, 2012, the 18th Loan Review Committee (No. 18th Loan Review Committee), as seen above, D applied for the loan of the principal debtor, the secured debtor, the secured debtor, and the amount of the loan at KRW 1.8 billion. The above loan agenda (hereinafter “the instant loan agenda”) and the other loan agenda were presented to the Defendant’s Loan Review Committee on August 30, 2012 (hereinafter “the instant loan Review Committee”).

2. On the other hand, the chairperson of the loan review committee of the defendant is the only standing director of the defendant, and E was absent as an educational trip at the time of holding the loan review committee of this case.

The other members are "Rules on the Scope of Duties of Agricultural Cooperatives".