1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim added at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:

In this case.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 1, 1987, the Plaintiff was employed as the subordinate agricultural cooperative (hereinafter referred to as “agricultural cooperative”) located in the Cheongju Agricultural Cooperative (hereinafter referred to as “agricultural cooperative”) and was transferred to the Defendant on April 6, 201 through the New Agricultural Cooperative and the Dong Agricultural Cooperative (hereinafter referred to as “agricultural cooperative”), and was in office as the director in charge of audit and planning and the member of the Loan Review Committee.

B. On August 23, 2012, the 17th Loan Review Committee (hereinafter “former Loan Review Committee”) Defendant on August 23, 2012 (hereinafter “former Loan Review Committee”).

(2) The Plaintiff attended the previous Loan Review Committee and opposed to the loan on the ground that “The primary debtor C, D(C’s type), and 800 million won in the amount of loan.” (2) The Plaintiff is suspected of using the loan amounting to KRW 430 million in the name of the primary debtor C for the repayment of the existing debt amount D, etc., and the primary debtor C has no particular occupation, and the real estate offered as security is converted into a sports site.”

3) However, the above agenda was approved with the consent of a majority of the members. However, after compiling the Plaintiff’s dissenting opinion, the loan manager decided not to execute the loan considering the possibility of the collection of the loan. (C) On August 30, 2012, as the loan 18th Loan Review Committee (No. 18th Loan Review Committee, August 30, 2012), D applied for the loan of the principal debtor and the collateral amount of KRW 1.8 billion, and accordingly, two loans including the above loan agenda (hereinafter “the instant loan agenda”) were presented to the Defendant on August 30, 2012 to the Loan Review Committee (hereinafter “the instant loan Review Committee”).

2. Meanwhile, as the only standing director of the defendant, E, the chairperson of the Loan Review Committee, was absent as a business trip at the time of holding the Loan Review Committee.

If there is no person with authority to make a full decision among the "Rules on the Scope of Duties of Agricultural Cooperatives", other members shall make a full decision.