beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 171,222,394 as well as 5% per annum from January 27, 2015 to June 15, 2017 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 26, 2014, the Plaintiff is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with B with respect to the CFF vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”).
B. On November 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was negligent in driving the above oba while driving the oba while driving the oba in the direction from the ridge to the 36-lane 121,000 (hereinafter “instant intersection”); (b) while driving the above oba in the direction of the obba in the direction of the city, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant intersection”); (c) while driving the above oba in the direction of the obba in the direction of the oba, the Defendant did not temporarily stop the above oba to the intersection before entering the intersection, and proceeded the above obaba in the direction of the next park to the children’s oba; and (d) led the Plaintiff’s front right part of the instant obaba in the front part of the obaba in the direction of the road.
Accordingly, D died due to the injury such as brain side function before the same day.
C. On December 24, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 3,863,700,000 to the deceased’s bereaved family members as damages for the instant accident, and paid KRW 3,863,70 to the deceased’s medical expenses on January 26, 2015.
On the ground of the instant accident, B was indicted due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Defendant was in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act. In the case No. 2015-Ma355, the Seoul Eastern District Court 2015-Ma355, “B was driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle to temporarily stop at the entrance of the instant intersection at and near the speed of the instant intersection, or entered the intersection at the speed of a stop which is possible immediately as soon as possible. The Defendant: (a) was driving the instant Oraba on the speed higher than the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and then, (b) discovered the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the speed