logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.02.27 2017고단3698
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who drives a DNA cata in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury).

On October 23, 2017, the Defendant driven the above Oralb while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.2% among blood transfusions on October 23, 2017, and entered the intersection of the private distance of 138 Gwangju High School from the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of

The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was driving the above Oral ba, and the signal was stopped through the intersection in violation of the new subparagraph, and was caused by the Defendant’s fault entering the intersection in violation of the new subparagraph, and received as the front part of the Defendant’s right side of the FK3 of the victim E-driving who entered the intersection in accordance with the left left turn at the intersection from the opposite direction of the Defendant’s running direction.

The Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, suffered from the victim G, who was on board the back seat of the Defendant, for about two weeks of light fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluoral fluoral treatment to the victim E.

2. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.2% in blood at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and the Defendant driven a 6km dalb in a quantity of 6 km from the vicinity of the shooting distance in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Gangseo-gu, the Gansan-dong, the Madalbro at the vicinity of the shooting distance in the Gansan-dong, Gangseo-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a traffic accident actual investigation report and traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1, and 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 148-2 (2) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense (a point of driving under influence of alcohol);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.

arrow