logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.07.23 2015고단355
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, with respect to the defendant B, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, is a person who is engaged in the operation of unregistered 124cc c lebane.

On November 20, 2014, at the back of 14:58, the Defendant driven the victim I (the age of 15) while driving the above Oba, and led the J-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City to proceed the front intersection at the speed of the speed from the ridge to the ebbal direction.

In such a case, the driver has a duty of care to confirm whether another vehicle has entered the intersection and safely enter the intersection by properly examining the previous bank and the left and right before entering the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded without temporarily suspending prior to entering the intersection, and caused the victim, who is the passenger, to fall off on the floor, by shocking the front part of the Kan-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-kn-k

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the death of the victim at the National University Hospital located in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City at around 22:30 on the same day due to the above occupational negligence by brain side, etc.

2. Defendant B in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of the aforementioned unregistered post-registration dives.

No motor vehicle owner shall operate any motor vehicle on the road on which mandatory insurance is not subscribed.

Nevertheless, the defendant was driving the above divers, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as a motor vehicle owner, operated a motor vehicle on which no mandatory insurance was subscribed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant and A;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against Defendant A and Defendant A

arrow