1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 6, 2011, the Plaintiff went to the mountain station located in the Gangwon-do Gangwon-gun, and was faced with an accident that led to the collapse of the mountain road and the movement of the scambling part of the mountain (hereinafter “instant accident”).

On February 11, 2011, the Plaintiff was diagnosed to be suspected of “the damage of her malm and power lines, and the unknown rupture of his/her malm and her malm,” and was diagnosed to be “the rupture of his/her malm and her malm and the unknown rupture of his/her malm and broad malm.” on March 3, 2011, the Plaintiff was provided with a view that “the rupture of both sides was

On March 15, 2011, the Plaintiff was presented the opinion that “In the case of the high-ranking rupture and the right high-hand rupture than the left-hand rupture, it is necessary to conduct an operation immediately because the rupture is very serious.”

B. On April 4, 2011, the Plaintiff undergone an operation to transplant the bones on both sides of the center of the Seoul Asan Hospital, but the state was not improved. Accordingly, on September 26, 2013, the Plaintiff was subject to the Human Rights Precaution on the right upper part of the upper part of the center of the public notice on September 26, 2013, and on January 20, 2014.

C. On December 5, 2013, the Plaintiff received a diagnosis of a post-existence disability that “the condition of the codification of a mission, which is a dives of the dives of a mission, a dives of the dives of the dives of the dives of a bridge,” which constitutes “when the function of Section 1 of the dives of the dives of a bridge has been entirely lost” under the dives of the Classification of

On the other hand, on October 27, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with Defendant Eastern Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant East Fire”) for “non-payment profla 100 years old health insurance1008”, and on November 4, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for “Defendant Han Liver Multiflue Insurance Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter “Defendant Han Liver General Insurance”) and “1004” respectively.

(hereinafter “each of the instant insurance contracts”). The content of each of the instant insurance contracts relating to this case is as follows:

The terms and conditions of the contract and the terms and conditions of the subscription security for the multi-use dividends.