The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following circumstances: (a) the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case; (b) the defendant reflects his mistake; and (c) the defendant committed the crime in this case because of the elderly economic difficulties because of the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic harms the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex; and (b) the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have considerable social harm; (c) the defendant requires a simple and severe punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture; (d) the defendant continued to operate the same criminal record three times and repeats the crime in this case; (c) there is no special change of circumstances to change the punishment of the court below after the decision of the court below was rendered; and (d) the defendant's assertion is too unreasonable even if considering the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.