The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (two years of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: although the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case, the act of arranging sexual traffic is against the defendant's recognition of the facts charged in this case; however, since the act of arranging sexual traffic is likely to harm the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, it is not likely that the act of arranging sexual traffic is likely to harm the sound sexual culture and good morals, it is necessary to keep the spread of illegal sexual traffic business establishments and to make a strict and severe punishment in order to establish a sound sexual culture; furthermore, the defendant still has a heavy criminal liability in that he operated the same telecom, even though he had the same criminal record, and repeats the crime in this case; the defendant can have a record of criminal punishment in addition to the same criminal record in the above case; there is no special change of circumstances to change the punishment of the court below after the issuance of the judgment of the court below; the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, etc., even if considering the defendant's assertion,

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.