The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (7 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflected his mistake should be considered.

However, considering the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and that there is a need for a simple and strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, and other circumstances that form the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, the environment, the details and contents of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.