beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 6, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging official documents at the Gangnam Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on October 31, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 23, 201. On November 23, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. on December 1, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2012. On December 6, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for the same crime, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 10, 2012.
Criminal facts
Defendant (hereinafter “C”) and D, E, and F have adopted a resolution to simultaneously designate a false transfer of ownership by forging the certificate, etc. of vehicle transfer against the leased vehicles, stolen vehicles, etc. illegally acquired, and by disposing of and distributing the said vehicles. The Defendant shared the role of plucking, plucking, and selling the vehicles to be plucked and plucked, and distributing the proceeds therefrom to the accomplices by disposing of the vehicles that have been plucked and plucked, D, the role in charge of document forgery at the Defendant’s request, and E and F, the role in directly performing the role of “bre” or “brecing,” which provides the false registration name of the vehicle.
1. On March 19, 2010, the Defendant: (a) procured a passenger car owned by Samsung Card Co., Ltd. as a plucker, and forged a certificate of seal impression and a certificate of transfer of the said company’s name to Samsung Card Co., Ltd.; (b) forged a certificate of seal impression and a certificate of transfer of the said company’s name to Samsung Card Co., Ltd.; and (c) around 18:00 on the same day after completing a false transfer of ownership to the said benz car under his/her name by using the aforementioned forged document; (d) sold the said car to the victim as if he/she were a normal vehicle with real ownership.
However, the above car was owned by Samsung Card Co., Ltd., and the defendant and E are above.