logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2013.05.30 2013고단102
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 20, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the charge of forging official documents at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment was finalized on July 28, 2011.

The Defendant, along with C and D, forged an official document registration certificate, a corporation’s certificate of personal seal impression, a business registration certificate, and a certificate of transfer of a motor vehicle in the name of a juristic person, which is a private document, and falsely transferred the registration of a high-class motor vehicle owned by the juristic person under the name of the Defendant, D, etc. using it, and sold the said motor vehicle as if the said motor vehicle was a motor vehicle that was normally transferred and registered as a vehicle, not a leased vehicle, and publicly offered in order to divide the price into one another (i.e.,

Accordingly, on April 26, 2010, the Defendant registered the transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant using the aforementioned forged document at the office of Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 2010. On April 28, 2010, the Defendant: (a) the foregoing vehicle was a leased vehicle owned by the IMW Social Services Korea (State); and (b) the Defendant’s registration of the transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant was null and void by using forged documents; (c) the Defendant et al. did not have the intent or ability to sell the above vehicle normally to the victim F; (d) the victim met the victim at G in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu on the 27th day of the same month; and (e) the victim made a false statement stating that “I would have no problem with the vehicle; and (e) the victim was transferred from the victim to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on April 28, 2010, as the vehicle price in the name of the Defendant, KRW 27 million in the name of H bank.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim in collusion with D or C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against D or C;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Investigation report (Attachment to the Motor Vehicle Register);

1. Attachment, such as a motor vehicle transfer certificate, motor vehicle register, and bank transaction statement;

arrow