logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.07.06 2016고단2255
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On April 7, 2016, the Defendant appealed from the Busan District Court for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. and filed an appeal for one year and two months, and is still pending in the trial.

[2] On January 22, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Busan District Court No. 352, which was located in the 31st court of the Busan District Court, around 14:00 on January 22, 2016, on the 352nd court of the Busan District Court, and on the 6476st order of the above court, Defendant E violated the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence).

In the above case, E, at the request of the Defendant, 1,40,000 won in total from D around March 15, 2015 and around March 16, 2015, 2000 won in total, and 2,15,000 won in total from D, and 15,000 won in total from D, and 2,000,000 won in total from D, and 7,000,000 won in total from D upon D’s request, was sent to E, on March 15, 2015. The Defendant 1,40,000 won in total, sent 1,00 won in total to E, with D’s request, and 7,000,000 won in total, received from the above D upon request of the above D on March 16, 2015.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s “Defendant E” was delivered KRW 1.4 million in cash received from the witness D at the vicinity of the G market located in the Gangseo-gu, Busan around March 15, 2015, from the witness, and 1.4 million won in cash received from the witness D at the time of his/her opening, and 10g of phiphones for the witness.

There is no "no" in the newspaper "."

The Defendant testified as “,” and the Defendant delivered KRW 700,000,000,000,000 which the witness received from D from the witness on March 16, 2015 at the end of the summer-dong, Nam-gu, Busan, and there is no fact that the witness gave about 5 gramphones to the witness.

The testimony was made “for example” in the newspaper called “.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each prosecution of M, N, and E.

arrow