logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.05.13 2014고단357
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 02:55 on February 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) while driving a D-to-pp motor vehicle in the state of drinking without obtaining a driver’s license on the front of the “C-cafeteria” in B, the Defendant was required to comply with the drinking measurement by inserting the drinking measuring instrument from around 03:22 to about 20 minutes of the same day, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was under the influence of drinking, such as drinking alcohol and drinking on the face, from F in the process of belonging to E-district, he/she was able to recognize that he/she was under the influence of drinking from the light police station life safety and living safety of the light police station life, and from around 20 minutes of the same day, he/she refused the drinking test.

Accordingly, the defendant driving the above car without obtaining a driver's license, and did not comply with a police officer's request for alcohol measurement without any justifiable reason.

"2014 Highest 444"

1. Around 02:55 on February 10, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face on his/her hand alone, even though the police officer was dispatched to the site after receiving a report at one time, on the ground that the victim G (57 years of age) stopped the cargo vehicle rhym and obstructed the way, while driving a D-to-purd vehicle on the front of the C-cafeteria located in B in a light-to-light city.

2. Around 03:15 on February 10, 2014, when the Defendant was arrested and investigated as a flagrant offender at the E District E District located in Ha, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by referring to “Chos, sick, sick, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluoring fluor, fluor, fluoring fluor, fluor, and gluor in governance” to G in the process where the said G et al. were observed.

Summary of Evidence

"2014 Highest 357"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Smoking photographs;

arrow