logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.11.09 2017고단3526
컴퓨터등사용사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From June 28, 2010 to December 2012, the Defendant: (a) known that the government subsidy was deposited in the Busan Bank account (Account Number: C) in the name of the victim B in the name of the victim on June 28, 2010 while the Defendant resided together in the Defendant’s home from June 2010 to June 28, 2010; (b) provided the victim B with the statement that “I would like to collect money from the victim B because the Plaintiff is still in need of management of the money, and I would like to receive money from the Busan Bank Account and one cash card in the name of the victim.”

1. On July 21, 2010, the Defendant released 6.80,000 won in cash by inserting B’s cash card at a location of the Busan District Bank located in Busan District, Busan District, and inputting B’s secret number into the cash payment machine at a location of the Busan District Bank.

From around that time to November 20, 2012, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 18,230,200 from the automatic payment machine to cash or withdrawn it by issuing a check to him/her, using the cash card linked to the account in the name of B over 47 times, such as the one in attached Table 1.

Accordingly, the Defendant stolen KRW 18,230,200 against the will of the victim Busan Bank's automatic payment manager.

2. On April 20, 201, the Defendant, such as a computer, entered the Busan Bank’s Busan Bank’s cash card in the above name in the automatic payment machine of the Busan Bank’s management of the Busan Bank, and entered 481,200 won from B’s Busan Bank’s Busan Bank’s Busan Bank’s Busan Bank’s Busan Bank’s account (Account Number:D). However, in the indictment, “Defendant’s Busan Bank’s account (Account Number: E)” is written, in light of the details of the Busan Bank’s transactions (Account Number 32 pages) and the list of crimes, it is obvious that this is a clerical error, and thus, the indictment is corrected as above.

The transfer was made.

From around that time to December 20, 2012, the Defendant is subsumed to Table 2 attached hereto.

arrow