logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2015.01.21 2012나3256
채무부존재확인
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Attached Form

3 The term “Plaintiff” under the “justifiable Calculation sheet of Sales Price” means the “Plaintiff.”

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 18, 200, Seo-gu Daejeon District, Seo-gu W, X,Y, U.S. Z, AB, AC, AD, AE, and Daejeon City Corporation (hereinafter “instant project district”) were designated as a district subject to the development of the housing site (hereinafter “instant project district”). The Korea Land Corporation and Daejeon City Corporation designated as a joint project implementer for the instant project district and the Daejeon City Corporation implemented the instant housing site development project within the said project district (hereinafter “instant housing site development project”).

On October 2009, the Korea Land Corporation merged with the defendant and succeeded to the rights and obligations of the Korea Land Corporation.

200-12-18 Designation of the first designated housing site development zone 2001-12-20 of the second designated housing site development zone 2003-12-16 of the second designated housing site development zone 2003-12-16 and a compensation plan 2005-05-31 of the approval of the development plan for housing site development shall be publicly announced in a daily newspaper at that time, and at that time, the designation and alteration of the plan 2007-04-05 housing site development zone 2007-11-09 of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (Public Notice BU), the designation and alteration of the development plan for housing site development zone 2007-123 housing site development zone 2008-12-23 housing site development zone, the alteration and alteration of the plan and the approval of the alteration of the implementation plan for housing site development plan (Public Notice BW).

B. The Defendant, as the instant housing site development project is incorporated into the instant project zone, intended to preferentially sell the migrants’ housing site to be developed within the instant project zone as relocation measures for those who have lost their means of living due to the expropriation of their owned housing or land, etc.

C. Accordingly, the Defendant entered into a sales contract for the pre-settled housing site (hereinafter “each sales contract of this case”). The Plaintiffs directly entered into the sales contract with the Defendant, or succeeded to the rights and duties of the parties who entered into the sales contract before the lawsuit of this case.

arrow