1. According to a claim that has been changed in exchange at the trial, the defendant is in accordance with the attached Table 3's "Fair Calculation Table of Sale Price."

1. Basic facts

A. On December 18, 200, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, C, D, U.S. E, F, G, H, I, J, and K were designated as a planned area for the housing site development project (hereinafter “instant project district”). The Korea Land Corporation and Daejeon Urban Corporation designated as a joint project operator for the instant project district and the Daejeon Urban Corporation promoted the housing site development project within the said project district (hereinafter “instant housing site development project”) upon obtaining project approval as follows:

On October 2009, the Korea Land Corporation merged with the defendant and succeeded to the rights and obligations of the Korea Land Corporation.

200-12-18 Designation of the first designated housing site development zone 2001-12-20 of the second designated housing site development zone 2003-12-16 of the second designated housing site development zone 2003-12-16 of the housing site development zone, and a compensation plan 2005-05-31 of the approval of the development plan for the housing site development zone 2005-06 of the notification of compensation plan to landowners around that time, the designation and alteration of the implementation plan 2007-04-05 of the approval of the development plan 2006-06-05 of the development plan for the housing site development zone 2007-11-09 of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation for the housing site development zone 2007-123 housing site development zone 2008-123 housing site development zone, the alteration and alteration of the development plan and the approval of the implementation plan (AB).

B. The Defendant, as the instant housing site development project is incorporated into the instant project zone, intended to preferentially sell the migrants’ housing site to be developed within the instant project zone as relocation measures for those who have lost their means of living due to the expropriation of their owned housing or land, etc.

C. Accordingly, the Defendant entered into a sales contract for the pre-settled housing site (hereinafter “each sales contract of this case”). The Plaintiffs directly entered into the sales contract with the Defendant, or succeeded to the rights and duties of the parties who entered into the sales contract before the lawsuit of this case, and the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenors succeeded to this.