logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.07.23 2015가단205502
부당이득금
Text

1. The principal of the sales price obligations arising from the sale contract of the housing site for migrantss of the G Housing Site Development Zone for the Defendant A is 1.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 18, 200, Seo-gu Daejeon District, H, I, J, Sung-gu K, L, M,O, P, and Q Japan were designated as a planned area for the housing site development project (hereinafter “instant project district”). The Defendant designated as a joint project implementer for the instant project district as the joint project implementer for the instant project district, as follows, promoted the housing site development project for the Daejeon District (hereinafter “instant housing site development project”).

On December 18, 2000, the first designation of a planned housing site development zone on December 20, 2001, the second designation of a planned housing site development zone on December 20, 2001, and the approval of the development plan on December 16, 2003, on September 6, 2005, the designation and alteration of a planned housing site development zone on April 5, 2007 as the approval of the implementation plan on January 6, 2006 (R of the Daejeon Metropolitan City notification). The designation and alteration of a planned housing site development zone on November 9, 2007, the designation of a planned housing site development zone, the alteration of a planned housing site development plan, and the approval of the alteration of an implementation plan (T of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs notification) on December 23, 2008, the development plan of a planned housing site, the alteration of an implementation plan, and the approval

B.1) The Defendant, as the instant housing site development project was incorporated into the instant project zone, decided to specially sell migrantss’ housing sites to be developed within the instant project zone as relocation measures for those who have lost their means of living due to the expropriation of their owned housing or land, etc.. The Defendant concluded a contract for sale of the instant housing site (hereinafter “each contract for sale in this case”). Accordingly, the Defendant paid the amount corresponding to attached Form 2 calculation table (hereinafter “attached Table 2”) to the Defendant as those who directly concluded a contract for sale in this case with the Defendant, or who succeeded to rights and obligations from those who signed the contract for sale in this case.

C. Article 16 and Article 16 of the Rules on the Establishment and Implementation of Relocation Measures (hereinafter “Rules of this case”).

arrow