1. On August 23, 2018, the Defendant issued a disposition not to approve the Plaintiff’s additional medical care for occupational injury and extension of the period.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 26, 2017, the Plaintiff obtained approval for medical care from the Defendant on the part of his/her official duties for “afluence and adaptation disorder,” and on October 13, 2017, the Plaintiff received approval for the extension of the period of medical care for official duties (other physical disability, low-time disability, etc., obtained non-approval for the extension of the period of medical care for official duties) (from November 25, 2015 to July 3, 2018).

B. The Plaintiff applied for approval for the extension of the period of medical care to the Defendant on the ground that the period of medical care was from July 4, 2018 to December 31, 2018 with respect to the sinctosis during the period of the injury and disease.

On August 3, 2018, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition for the extension of the period of medical care for official duties (hereinafter “instant first disposition”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that “The period of medical care applied by the Plaintiff is a treatment period for a small-scale disability other than the time of approval for medical care for official duties, and there is no causal relationship between the period of approval for the extension of the period of medical care, and it is desirable to terminate the medical care except for the cases where the period of medical care becomes worse in a state where professional treatment is no longer necessary after receiving active treatment for a total of 952 days from July 3, 2018.”

C. The Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for approval of additional medical care for official duties with the period of medical care from July 4, 2018 to January 31, 2019, by providing that “other physical disability and plaza spacifies” (hereinafter “instant additional injury”).

On August 23, 2018, the Defendant issued a disposition not to approve additional medical care and extension of the period for official duties (hereinafter “instant Disposition 2”) against the Plaintiff on the ground that “the instant Additional Injury Disease is the name of the injury and disease that appears to have a greater influence on the Plaintiff’s individual vulnerability.”