logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.06.16 2017가단2099
건물명도(인도)등
Text

1. The defendant

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

B. From January 26, 2017, the delivery of the above building.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On January 25, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the lease deposit amounting to KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000 per annum, and the lease period from January 25, 2015 to January 25, 2016, and delivered the instant building to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the above lease contract was renewed after the lapse of the period.

B. On January 25, 2017, the Defendant continues to occupy and use the instant building without complying with the Plaintiff’s request for delivery even if the said lease agreement had expired.

Accordingly, the defendant is obligated to return to the plaintiff unjust enrichment equivalent to the delivery of the building of this case and the rent.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow