logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.05.12 2017가단1355
건물명도(인도)등
Text

1. The defendant against the plaintiff

A. At the same time, 5,000,000 won is paid, among real estate 206 square meters listed in the attached Table.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On October 10, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to lease the attached map No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.6 square meters (hereinafter “instant building No. 1”) part of the ship (a) connected each point of 1 in sequence with the Defendant, 5 million won for lease deposit, 5 million won for reappointment, and 5 million won for lease term from October 15, 2015 to October 14, 2016 (hereinafter “instant first lease contract”).

B. On October 25, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the lease of KRW 157.15 square meters on the land surface of 157.15 square meters (hereinafter “instant building”) among the real estate listed in the attached Table list (hereinafter “instant building”) with the Defendant, with the terms that the lease deposit amount of KRW 1 million, the reappointment fee of KRW 9 million, and the lease term of KRW 1 million from November 1, 2015 to October 31, 2016 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and delivered each of the instant buildings to the Defendant.

C. The Defendant continues to occupy and use each of the instant buildings without complying with the Plaintiff’s request for delivery even if each of the instant lease agreements expired on October 14, 2016 and October 31, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant is obligated to return unjust enrichment equivalent to the delivery and rent of each building of this case to the plaintiff.

2. Judgment by public notice of applicable provisions of Acts (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow