logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.04.14 2016가단17926
건물명도등
Text

1. The defendant against the plaintiffs

A. In the attached Form 1, (1), (2), (3), and (4), among the 164.325 square meters of the 1st floor of the building indicated in the attached list, the indication of the attached Form 1.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On October 28, 2014, the Plaintiffs entered into a contract with the Defendant to lease the instant building by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 200,00,00,000 per annum, annual rent of KRW 3.5 million, and period of lease from November 12, 2014 to November 12, 2015, with the content that the Plaintiff shall lease the instant building by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 101,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

On the other hand, the lease was first renewed after the expiration of the term.

B. On November 12, 2016, the Defendant continues to occupy and use the instant building without complying with the Plaintiff’s request for delivery even if the said lease agreement had been terminated.

Accordingly, the defendant is obligated to return to the plaintiff unjust enrichment equivalent to the delivery of the building of this case and the rent.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow