All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below rendered to the Defendants is unreasonable as it is too unreasonable that each punishment (Defendant A: imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes of August 2016 Godan1104 as decided by the court below, and imprisonment for the crimes of February 2016 Godan1512 as decided by the court below, and imprisonment for the crimes of January 2, 201) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendants shows an attitude against the victims when recognizing all of the crimes of this case; some damaged items were temporarily returned to the victims; Defendant A should consider equity with the case where a judgment of first head of the crime of this case was rendered in the judgment of the court below; Defendants 2 and 20 years old, and Defendant B had no record of punishment exceeding the fine prior to the instant case.

However, the crime of this case was committed three times by making the defendants show precious metals as if they were to purchase precious metals, and using precious metals as they were without any special circumstances to reduce the sentence of the court below, and considering the contents, methods, frequency, and scale of damage, etc. of the crime, the crime is not good, and there is no yet agreement with the victims, damage has been considerably recovered, and the defendants received juvenile protective disposition several times due to the crime of larceny. While the defendant A was under the period of suspension of the execution of the same crime, it is highly likely that he will be subject to criticism by taking into account the various circumstances of the defendants. The court below seems to have sentenced punishment by taking into account the unfavorable circumstances such as the defendants' age, character and behavior, environment, crime, circumstances, possibility of recidivism, methods of recidivism, criminal records after the crime, and criminal records and arguments.