logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.21 2016노4878
사기등
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that each sentence (the defendant A: the crime of 1. A. as indicated in the judgment of the court below: imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 1.b. D. as stated in the judgment of the court below: imprisonment for 1.2 months and 3 million won) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendants recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflected each of the crimes of this case, the return of childcare allowances received unlawfully by the defendant A, and the defendant A as to the judgment of the court below 1. A.

The crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in the judgment of the court below should be considered at the same time as the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties in the judgment of the court below. Defendant A has no record of punishment for the same crime, and Defendant B is the first offender, but the crime of this case is recognized as having been committed by Defendant A with a false report of birth in order to benefit multi-child households at the time of subscription for the house. Defendant A received childcare allowances for the children who have not been born. In fact, the Defendants reported false facts with respect to resident registration and reported the violation of the Resident Registration Act. In light of the period and frequency of the crime, organization and planning of the crime, expertise of the method of the crime, etc., the crime is very poor. Such crime requires strict punishment that interferes with the fair and efficient supply of multi-family housing and disturbs the order of the market, as well as disturbs the order of the actual damage to the end-user of the house. The lessees of the apartment house illegally sold to Defendant A cannot recover the deposit money due to additional measures to sell it, and thus, Defendants’ motive, motive and circumstances, etc.

3. Conclusion, the Defendants’ conclusion is as follows.

arrow